What's new
By:
Filters
LiteRECORDS

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Guest, before your account can be reviewed you must click the activation link sent to your email account. Please ensure you check your junk folders.
    If you do not see the link after 24 hours please open a support ticket.

Powerful New Vocal Remover AI - Instructions

DanzbergMusic said:
can ANYONE, please post instructions how to run it on mac?
I tried it several times, but nothing works out.
Click to expand...

I apologize, but I don't have a Mac I can test this on. Can you give more information regarding the issues you're experiencing?
 
Anjok said:
I updated that link. It's not working for you? I actually just updated it again today because we released 4.0.1 that includes some bug fixes. Please try it again and let me know if you're still having trouble.
Click to expand...

Returned home to download on PC and the updated link works just fine. Thank you.
 
[MENTION=39673]Anjok[/MENTION] will the window bug be fixed soon? Still present on my laptop with v4.0.1. On my laptop it still does not let me access the windows border or bar at the top for being able to minimize or exit the GUI. This is important to reposition the GUI on the screen. I can't get it unless I change the screen resolution. On my All in One Desktop PC it's perfectly fine.
 
NewAgeRipper said:
[MENTION=39673]Anjok[/MENTION] will the window bug be fixed soon? Still present on my laptop with v4.0.1. On my laptop it still does not let me access the windows border or bar at the top for being able to minimize or exit the GUI. This is important to reposition the GUI on the screen. I can't get it unless I change the screen resolution. On my All in One Desktop PC it's perfectly fine.
Click to expand...

Can you give me more details on that issue? I haven't experienced that on my end
 
NewAgeRipper said:
Reference page 48 and 49 please for screen shots. Also in version 4.0.1 it appears the window size is locked again.
https://literecords.com/showthread.php?65004-Powerful-New-Vocal-Remover-AI-Instructions/page48
Click to expand...

I'm not sure why you're having the banner issue, I confirmed that the problem was fixed with the last release. If you want to unlock the WINDOW SIZE value, remove the "_w512" part from the model filenames.

I went ahead and did that myself and re-uploaded the application here. Everything should work as intended out of the box - https://github.com/Anjok07/ultimate...ownload/v4.0.1/UVR_V4GUI_All_IN_ONE_12_10.zip
 
Anjok said:
I'm not sure why you're having the banner issue, I confirmed that the problem was fixed with the last release. If you want to unlock the WINDOW SIZE value, remove the "_w512" part from the model filenames.

I went ahead and did that myself and re-uploaded the application here. Everything should work as intended out of the box - https://github.com/Anjok07/ultimate...ownload/v4.0.1/UVR_V4GUI_All_IN_ONE_12_10.zip
Click to expand...

It's not the banner. It's the window frame. At the top I should have an "Exit" and "Minimize" area. The screen shot on page 48 does not show that. It's only on laptops this happens, On my All in One Desktop PC, I can close and minimize the GUI.

 
Last edited:
WOW! 272 setting took 4 hours to finish one song for me! Anjok was not joking lol
I have an MBPRO but running Python on Parallels VM so not much I can do about it. Doubt there will ever be a Mac version of this.
Can't wait for advancements in the vocal making application.
 
INGSOC said:
WOW! 272 setting took 4 hours to finish one song for me! Anjok was not joking lol
I have an MBPRO but running Python on Parallels VM so not much I can do about it. Doubt there will ever be a Mac version of this.
Can't wait for advancements in the vocal making application.
Click to expand...

I honestly don't see much improvements for getting better quality vocals than what can already be gotten by inverting an instrumental against a full mix. To be honest after I've made my instrumental from Vocal remover, that's exactly what I do. most times the vocals are better than what the remover gave me.
 
NewAgeRipper said:
I honestly don't see much improvements for getting better quality vocals than what can already be gotten by inverting an instrumental against a full mix. To be honest after I've made my instrumental from Vocal remover, that's exactly what I do. most times the vocals are better than what the remover gave me.
Click to expand...

No, when you take the UVR instrumental and invert to the source you are not going to get studio quality for the simple fact that the frequencies in the vocal spectrum cannot just be surgically extracted from a song without damage to one or the other. The instrumentals made with UVR sound so good because some of those frequencies are left in the instrumental. The conundrum of making software to extract only good quality vocals is unsolvable in my opinion until some technology comes along that can analyze, mimic and replace. Kind of like a smart voice emulator that could literally re-sing the song.
 
INGSOC said:
No, when you take the UVR instrumental and invert to the source you are not going to get studio quality for the simple fact that the frequencies in the vocal spectrum cannot just be surgically extracted from a song without damage to one or the other. The instrumentals made with UVR sound so good because some of those frequencies are left in the instrumental. The conundrum of making software to extract only good quality vocals is unsolvable in my opinion until some technology comes along that can analyze, mimic and replace. Kind of like a smart voice emulator that could literally re-sing the song.
Click to expand...

Oh I understand that. But I did in one instance get something that sounded studio. What I'm saying is, the vocal track you get from UVR has more artifacts in it than the acapella you will get by inverting anyway. I never said you would get studio quality. I just said "better" than the one UVR gives you.
 
well lads ive been away doing other things recently and came back to the collab method of vocal removal only to find i cant get it to work....
even tried the old version same error

/bin/bash: -c: line 0: unexpected EOF while looking for matching `"'
/bin/bash: -c: line 1: syntax error: unexpected end of file

its probably been fixed previously but i have looked ....no joy
can someone point me in the right direction.......cheers
 
rkeane said:
well lads ive been away doing other things recently and came back to the collab method of vocal removal only to find i cant get it to work....
even tried the old version same error

/bin/bash: -c: line 0: unexpected EOF while looking for matching `"'
/bin/bash: -c: line 1: syntax error: unexpected end of file

its probably been fixed previously but i have looked ....no joy
can someone point me in the right direction.......cheers
Click to expand...

For Google Colab go back to main page here. Scroll down to Google Colab method and download the 2. file.
Open your colab page and remove all other sessions. Upload the new one you downloaded. Everything should work after that.
 
NewAgeRipper said:
For Google Colab go back to main page here. Scroll down to Google Colab method and download the 2. file.
Open your colab page and remove all other sessions. Upload the new one you downloaded. Everything should work after that.
Click to expand...

its ok mate i got it cheers
 
NewAgeRipper said:
It's not the banner. It's the window frame. At the top I should have an "Exit" and "Minimize" area. The screen shot on page 48 does not show that. It's only on laptops this happens, On my All in One Desktop PC, I can close and minimize the GUI.

Click to expand...

[MENTION=39673]Anjok[/MENTION] any word on this yet?
 
Wanted to share a little trick I did on the Karaoke model. I just renamed the Sampling Rate to be 44100 (change 33075 to be 44100 in the model name), since I noticed originally it was cutting off at 15kHz and the high ends of songs were getting lost.

This doesn't affect the quality of the vocals extracted, from what I can hear, so it's good.
 
I honestly can't tell the difference in audio quality between 512 and 320. I think 512 is fine for the majority of lossless songs. 272 took almost 4 hours on my MBPRO.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.